With incandescent bulbs out of the competition, homeowners and other customers alike have three main choices for their lighting – the LEDs with their increasing popularity, the mainstay CFLs and the lesser-known halogens. Most customers tend to stick to their preferred type, but if you are planning to make an upgrade, a comparison between these three main types will certainly help you – read on below if you are interested!

  • LEDs – LEDs are advertised nowadays as the most energy-efficient lighting option that not only consumes little in the way of electrical energy, but it also extremely long-lasting. It is their low electrical expenses that have made the classification of bulb brightness according to the wattage useless: nowadays, lumens are used in brightness classification for a more accurate depiction. For example, the classic table and floor lamps sets’ bulbs – commonly known as the A19 bulbs – would usually be sold as 60-watts incandescent bulbs. Yet, their LED equivalent only consumes a fraction of this: around one-sixth to be exact. Couple this with their lifespan – one year at most in the case of incandescent bulbs, and around twenty-five years in the case of LEDs – and most consumers are already sold on their decision. The only drawback that LED bulbs might have would be in their upfront costs, which are definitely quite high when compared to the alternatives. However, this comparison is somewhat unfair: LED bulbs are meant to last for two decades at the very least, whereas other options would definitely never last for so long.
  • CFLs – the traditional energy-saving option for modern wall lights Australia, ceiling lights and what other lighting fixtures were the CFL lights. As most people would know, the CFL bulbs were a stark contrast to their incandescent counterparts back in the day: whereas the latter would offset a warm glow, the CFL bulbs had an almost-glaring, bluish hue to their white light. This is a result of the technology behind them, which created an ultraviolet light (which became visible light) by passing of electricity through gases such as mercury and argon. CFLs are definitely energy-efficient, saving up to around seventy percent when compared to incandescent bulbs, but still rank lower than LEDs, which can come up to ninety percent of total savings. However, it should be noted that CFLs are comparatively cheaper, and come with a decent lifespan of around a decade.
  • Halogens – the halogen light bulbs are an environment-friendly option for incandescent bulbs, as they too use a filament of tungsten. The difference is the presence of halogen elements, which makes them comparatively more efficient than the traditional bulb. Nonetheless, they are still not a worthy match to either CFL or LED alternatives. Browse this website to find out more details.